<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Film Talk - Latest Comments in The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/</link><description>Podcast Film Reviews from Belfast and Nashville</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:14:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1877225</link><description>Clancy Brown's Bar</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:14:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1876789</link><description>"In Ancient China, a mythical battle took place" ????  That's hilarious!  It's almost as bad as the opening to Pathfinder, which says, "this is the untold legend of the vikings coming to America..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1238214</link><description>Ha! Ha! Thanks Phil, this hadn't escaped my attention either. I only used Tom B because a few weeks ago someone else was posting as Tom and I didn't wish to cause confusion. However, we've not heard from him in a while so I may go ahead and claim the singular title for myself - I think that's only fair!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom_B</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1216954</link><description>Did anyone else notice Tom's name, when put all together, is "TomB" (as in, the very thing that contains Mummies, Dragon Emperors, Podcast Curses, etc. etc)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmmmmmmmmmm.....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1159660</link><description>Good question!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1157384</link><description>Good question, Tom.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would "Gone With The Wind" be considered the first blockbuster?  For a while at least it held the record for highest number of tickets sold (when released and in the modern era - not sure if anyone has passed them) - and was top domestic box office when adjusted for inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Modern era?  I don't know -- was 'Jaws' the first "summer blockbuster"?  Star Wars?  I would call neither dumb, but I know what you mean...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also:  speaking of the death of cinema...more people went to the movies in the 40's than they do today.  Prices?  Quality of movies?  Internet / VODs?  Some combination?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1156335</link><description>Ok, I have more to say on the subject of big CGI blockbusters, but have to get the initial response to the show out there while it's still fresh in my mind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A question: What came first, big dumb blockbusters or audiences who are willing to part with good money to see big dumb blockbusters?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom B</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1155577</link><description>also, billy connolly in boondock saints was freaky too!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1155558</link><description>WARNING: Cursed!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:36:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1147475</link><description>Why on the big screen?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1147028</link><description>I never was interested in the X-Files TV show.  I saw the first movie, and it was OK -- just kind of a 2 hr TV show I thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jett, I think that instead of non-violent means of preventing people from seeing movies like the Mummy, take a cue from Batman - don a Bat-suit, lurk outside of theaters, and pummel people you suspect are going to pay money to see movies such as The Mummy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1144038</link><description>Definitely a curse.  I think the show's blessed me though - I turned down my friend trying to get me to go to both of these films and clearly I was right to do so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenny</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1137993</link><description>Is TFT 31 cursed??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 31 - The Mummy Vs. The X-Files</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/08/08/the-film-talk-part-31-the-mummy-vs-the-x-files/#comment-1136837</link><description>As to kill time, and in true TFT fashion, Im going to go ahead and pre(re)view this episode: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"You'll get -wrapped up- in the insight of this week's episode of The Film Talk."  &lt;br&gt;"This X-files review gets an A "&lt;br&gt;and of course&lt;br&gt;"Dr. Gareth Higgins professes! In this action-fueled, adrenaline thrill ride!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fordmatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:14:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>