<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Film Talk - Latest Comments in The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/</link><description>Podcast Film Reviews from Belfast and Nashville</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:50:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942111</link><description>Cheers for the tip iremonger - had a look and I hadn't 'flipped a switch' on Libsyn properly! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ glad ya like the new look of the site: we're also on &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/thefilmtalk" rel="nofollow"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=29562546279&amp;amp;ref=mf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's an experiment - we'll see if the Dear Listener is interested in what Gareth and I are up to and interested in reviewing movies as well on Facebook.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942110</link><description>I thought I should let you know that this episode hasn't shown up on the RSS feed yet. Loving the show and the new look!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iremonger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942109</link><description>You know - I'd say both!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:40:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942108</link><description>i picked up the phrase from someone else - who compared film artists to cinematic industrialists in an article about brett ratner and brian singer.  can you guess which is which?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gareth Higgins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942107</link><description>'cinematic industrialists' is a nice turn of phrase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cinema has been industrial for a long time - but now w/flip cams and youtube - it can be something else - almost weightless maybe...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942106</link><description>PS: Not that I want anyone's career ruined.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gareth Higgins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942105</link><description>James McAvoy will be perfectly fine - he's talented and good-looking; the problem for me is that 'Wanted' will not ruin anyone's career.  Because it's just the kind of film that cinematic industrialists love to make.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gareth Higgins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942104</link><description>It's a terrible horrible awful ugly film in all dimensions.  As for McAvoy = he'll be fine! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:11:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942103</link><description>Sorry (but not surprised) to hear that Wanted is so terrible - I was so excited about James McAvoy after The Last King of Scotland.  Hopefully it's a blip too small to ruin the lad's career.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenny</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:04:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942102</link><description>Oh my god Domino - since the entire film was shot w/filters/dutch angles/fast cutting etc, when the characters went on a mescaline trip the director had nowhere to go!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942101</link><description>Ah, you poor gentlemen! You made me feel quite sad by the end of the show. However, it was nice to hear something encouraging about Hancock. I was looking forward to it a lot and then was put off by lukewarm reviews - not that I should be swayed by such things!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I forgive you for mentioning the 'Domino' word, a film so utterly devoid of any merit and so offending of my sensibilities that my blood boils when it is mentioned. Indeed, two hours of my life that I feel thoroughly robbed of. I still ask myself exactly way I stuck it til the end - certainly wasn't anything to do with Miss One Note Knightley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom B</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942100</link><description>Am not sure sure the extra 'd' will add much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ am off to see Hellboy 2 tonight - let's see if we can do a Hellboy2/JTTCOTE double bill!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942099</link><description>maestro!  i shall go to jttcote also, though sadly little old belfast appears to be without a 3-d print...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gareth Higgins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942098</link><description>I'm tellin' ya 'Spoiler's Ahoy! Ringtones' are the way to go!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ I'm thinkin' of actually going to see JTTCOTE in 3D - just for the hell of it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ Brendan Fraser = the Poor Man's Hugh Jackman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come to think of it Hugh Jackman is the Poor Man's Hugh Jackman.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jett Loe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 22:58:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942097</link><description>I must say I agree with the Good Prof. Dr.'s assessment of Hancock, although I was very intrigued by the Maestro's explanation of it's themes - which I admittedly did not notice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I loved the first two-thirds of this movie, but thought they completely fumbled final third.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the rest of the show:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) We now have new I-Phones in the future&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) I love the "Spoilers Ahoy!" ringtone idea...it's almost as if it's alerting the recipient of the call that there may possibly be a spoiler coming from the one calling once they answer the phone ("we've run out of milk!")&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(3) Journey To The Center of the Earth:  "You'll pray Brendan Fraser never returns!"   ...that's a bit harsh, perhaps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did not see "Wanted" and you have only confirmed what I already suspected.  Terrible movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:25:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk - Part 27 - Hancock is Wanted!</title><link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/#comment-3942096</link><description>note to past Jett and Gareth: well, here in the future books are outlawed, replicants and cylons freely walk among us, everyone takes soma and they play that damned 'brazil' song everywhere you go...but, having said that, i REALLY want to see Hancock now! and Wanted looked atrocious in the trailer, i'm glad to hear ya'll watched it so i don't have to! (or atTEMPTed to watch it ;) )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>